 |
2016-01-11 19:09:23 I'm sorry, I didn't catch your name :.●●●●●●●●●●●●oger.●●●●●●tane-●●●●●●se-●●●●●●-uk.pptx ●●●●●●●●●●●● ●●●●●●ne ●●●●●●ble uk ●●●●●●d ●●●●●●ment What does this all mean for ●●●●●●●●●●●●? Well, ●●●●●●g the clock back on the pill isn't ●●●●●● ●●●●●●le, they argue. "From a ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ctive, ●●●●●●ts to turn the ●●●●●●logy clock ●●●●●●rd by ●●●●●●g women ●●●●●● to ●●●●●●on and ●●●●●●●●●●●●n is ●●●●●●ly not ●●●●●●le, and even if it were ●●●●●●le, it would ●●●●●● ●●●●●● be both ●●●●●●rable and ●●●●●●●●●●●●ctive," they write. "On the ●●●●●●ry, ●●●●●●s ●●●●●● be made to ●●●●●● that women can use the new ●●●●●●●●●●●● if they ●●●●●● to do so." But they also take away from this study the ●●●●●●sion that cuts to ●●●●●●e for ●●●●●● ●●●●●●s would be ill-●●●●●●d. "Cuts in ●●●●●●e, as ●●●●●●tly ●●●●●●ed, would only ●●●●●●r ●●●●●●rize the ●●●●●●s," they write. "Such cuts would have ●●●●●● ●●●●●● on the ●●●●●● of out-of-●●●●●●k ●●●●●●en while ●●●●●●●●●●●●g those ●●●●●●y on ●●●●●●e yet ●●●●●●r." |