 |
2016-03-02 03:32:32 Some First Class ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ch paper ●●●●●●ting I kept ●●●●●●g for the ●●●●●●s to ●●●●●● “●●●●●●e,” but I was left ●●●●●●sfied. The ●●●●●●s’ ●●●●●● ●●●●●●s to be “●●●●●● ●●●●●●ee, so it’s not a ●●●●●●e.” Um, if this is how it works, I think ●●●●●●e ●●●●●● to ●●●●●● C●●●●●●cus. They do have an ●●●●●●sting quote about how some ●●●●●●ic ●●●●●●●●●●●●s can’t be ●●●●●●ed by even the best data, but, ●●●●●●●●●●●●y for the ●●●●●●s, I don’t think that most ●●●●●●ists would agree with the quote. F●●●●●●more, even when ●●●●●●ists do agree with the ●●●●●●ple, they ●●●●●●tand that much of the ●●●●●●●●●●●● is about ●●●●●●ive value ●●●●●●nts, which are a bit ●●●●●●d from the ●●●●●● ●●●●●●e of ●●●●●●ics. (In other words, just ●●●●●●e you see a ●●●●●● ●●●●●● of ●●●●●●ists ●●●●●●g ●●●●●●ir ●●●●●●cal ●●●●●●opher doesn’t mean that ●●●●●●ics is ●●●●●●cal ●●●●●●ophy.) |