 |
2016-04-05 00:14:22 Would you like a ●●●●●●t? ●●●●●●era ●●●●●● price A ●●●●●●nt to let us ●●●●●● as much of our ●●●●●●l gas as we can. Now what I'm ●●●●●● of is that that's going to raise ●●●●●● to the oil-●●●●●● level. E●●●●●●e says that the only way to let gas ●●●●●● ●●●●●● is to use free ●●●●●● ●●●●●●s and let ●●●●●● ●●●●●● as much as they want and let the free ●●●●●● ●●●●●● what the price ●●●●●● be. That ●●●●●● very good, but it ●●●●●● the point that oil is not a free ●●●●●●. Oil ●●●●●● are set by the OPEC ●●●●●●. If it weren't for the ●●●●●●, oil ●●●●●● would ●●●●●●ly be ●●●●●●r than ●●●●●●l gas. So we ●●●●●●n't be ●●●●●●g ●●●●●●l gas rise to the ●●●●●●-set oil price; we ●●●●●● be ●●●●●●g ●●●●●●l gas stay at its real ●●●●●● price, which is what ●●●●●● are ●●●●●●g to pay right now and what it costs ●●●●●● to ●●●●●●e it at an ●●●●●●e ●●●●●●. And, if we have that, that will ●●●●●● ●●●●●●rce this whole ●●●●●●●●●●●●g boom. And we'll get a lot more jobs out of the ●●●●●●●●●●●●g boom than we will get from ●●●●●●ing all of our ●●●●●●l gas, or even half of it. |