 |
2016-04-07 10:37:45 Cool site ●●●●●●ck :) ●●●●●●pine ●●●●●●●●●●●● I can’t help ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ng of Larry S●●●●●● as the guy who ●●●●●●●●●●●● that the ●●●●●● for the ●●●●●● of ●●●●●● ●●●●●●e ●●●●●●sors was due to a lower ●●●●●●e ●●●●●● among women. Forget the fact that ●●●●●●l ●●●●●●s and ●●●●●●s get paid more than ●●●●●●sors of ●●●●●●s or ●●●●●●try or ●●●●●●y. Forget the fact that these high ●●●●●● ●●●●●●sions are ●●●●●● a huge ●●●●●● of women. Forget the fact that to ●●●●●● a ●●●●●●sor, you will be ●●●●●●ng 5-7 years in ●●●●●●te ●●●●●●, ●●●●●●ed by ●●●●●●r 3-4 years as a ●●●●●●c ●●●●●● ●●●●●●g, and after that, as an ●●●●●●ant ●●●●●●sor, ●●●●●● only ~65-70Kyear and ●●●●●●g 80 ●●●●●●eek. As a ●●●●●●ogist, you’ll be ●●●●●● 200 Kyear after the same ●●●●●● of time. A●●●●●●ng to this “●●●●●●ist”, the ●●●●●● why women are ●●●●●●ng MD’s and JD’s ●●●●●● than PhD’s is due to their lower ●●●●●●. He didn’t even ●●●●●●er the ●●●●●●ility that pay might be a ●●●●●●. Let’s not ●●●●●●er the ●●●●●●ive ●●●●●● of his ●●●●●●ts. This utter lack of ●●●●●● sense on his part ●●●●●● be ●●●●●● for us to worry about his ●●●●●●ent as an ●●●●●●ist. |