 |
2016-04-11 06:46:08 P●●●●●● to meet you :.●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●iere-e-●●●●●●ssi-●●●●●●297-amici-di-brugg. ●●●●●●an ●●●●●● loss I'm going to give you, I'm ●●●●●●, a kind of soft ●●●●●●m, a hard ●●●●●● on this. But we're ●●●●●●ng from a ●●●●●●vely low base, and a ●●●●●●vely low base of ●●●●●●ation from users of NYTimes, and our other ●●●●●●l ●●●●●●, all video from The Times. But I think there are ●●●●●● quite ●●●●●●aging signs over the last 9 to 12 ●●●●●●, but when we do get video right, be it a ●●●●●●ed for a big ●●●●●●ng story, some of the video used ●●●●●● the ●●●●●●on ●●●●●●gn, the video ●●●●●●ed -- not all ●●●●●●zed, it must be said, ●●●●●● the Boston ●●●●●●g or the video ●●●●●● ●●●●●●s like the ●●●●●●ion of a new pope, we do well there. I think the ●●●●●●rship I ●●●●●●ned, with Retro Report, ●●●●●●ation of other high-●●●●●●y video were ●●●●●●sful. I think use of video in the ●●●●●●edia story, Snow Fall, at the end of last year, are all ●●●●●●es. When we get it right, it can be very eye-●●●●●●ng. What R●●●●●● is now ●●●●●●g work on now, ●●●●●●n the ●●●●●●om and the ●●●●●●ss side of The New York Times, is an ●●●●●●ated ●●●●●●mming ●●●●●●gy for video. And ●●●●●●gh ●●●●●●tly, the ●●●●●●s for ●●●●●●e video ●●●●●●ising are very low, the ●●●●●●●●●●●●y rates of ●●●●●●se, 600%, 700%, 800% in some ●●●●●● of ●●●●●●se in ●●●●●●e, and the ●●●●●●ve ●●●●●●ial and the ●●●●●●te for ●●●●●●isers mean, I think that in due ●●●●●●, the ●●●●●●unity can be very large ●●●●●●. Over time, we ●●●●●●, ●●●●●●e we are not the only ●●●●●●hing house, ●●●●●●sted in video, most of the world's ●●●●●●t ●●●●●●s are ●●●●●●ng hard about video. We ●●●●●● to see [●●●●●●●●●●●●e] video to come down. But the ●●●●●●te, ●●●●●●●●●●●● from ●●●●●●isers, for ●●●●●●●●●●●●s to do video ●●●●●●ising on The New York Times are so great, that we think our -- the ●●●●●● we have to grow our share of the video ad ●●●●●● is large ●●●●●●, even if rates over time, come down. |