 |
2016-04-11 13:11:24 I work here :●●●●●●ood.●●●●●●taly-expo2015-●●●●●●e-●●●●●● ●●●●●●c ●●●●●●iptan nasal spray The C●●●●●●ee's ●●●●●●ons ●●●●●●ing the asset ●●●●●●se ●●●●●●m (and the ●●●●●●l ●●●●●● of ●●●●●●ry ●●●●●●) ●●●●●● on our ●●●●●●ment of the ●●●●●●ic ●●●●●●k and of the ●●●●●●tive ●●●●●●ss ●●●●●● our ●●●●●●ives. Of ●●●●●●, ●●●●●●ic ●●●●●●sts must be ●●●●●●d when new ●●●●●●ation ●●●●●●s and are thus ●●●●●●arily ●●●●●●ional. As I noted, the ●●●●●●ic ●●●●●●es that C●●●●●●ee ●●●●●●●●●●●● saw as most ●●●●●● in their June ●●●●●●tions ●●●●●●ed ●●●●●●uing gains in labor ●●●●●●s, ●●●●●●ted by ●●●●●●te ●●●●●● that picks up over the next ●●●●●●l ●●●●●●rs as the ●●●●●●int from ●●●●●● ●●●●●● ●●●●●●shes. C●●●●●●ee ●●●●●●●●●●●● also saw ●●●●●●ion ●●●●●● back ●●●●●● our 2 ●●●●●●t ●●●●●●ive over time. If the ●●●●●●ng data were to be ●●●●●●y ●●●●●●tent with these ●●●●●●tions, we ●●●●●●pated that it would be ●●●●●●riate to begin to ●●●●●●te the ●●●●●●y pace of ●●●●●●ses later this year. And if the ●●●●●●uent data ●●●●●●ued to ●●●●●●m this ●●●●●●n of ●●●●●●g ●●●●●●ic ●●●●●●ement and ●●●●●●izing ●●●●●●ion, we ●●●●●●ed to ●●●●●●ue to ●●●●●● the pace of ●●●●●●ses in ●●●●●●ed steps ●●●●●●h the first half of next year, ●●●●●● them ●●●●●● ●●●●●●r. At that point, if the ●●●●●●y had ●●●●●●d along the lines we ●●●●●●pated, the ●●●●●●ry would have ●●●●●● ●●●●●●r ●●●●●●um, ●●●●●●●●●●●● would be in the ●●●●●●ty of 7 ●●●●●●t, and ●●●●●●ion would be ●●●●●● ●●●●●● our 2 ●●●●●●t ●●●●●●ive. Such ●●●●●●es would be fully ●●●●●●tent with the goals of the asset ●●●●●●se ●●●●●●m that we ●●●●●●ished in S●●●●●●er. |