 |
2016-04-17 07:55:55 A ●●●●●●ial ●●●●●●r :●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●.●●●●●●●●●●●●ap23. ●●●●●●x ●●●●●● for ●●●●●●●●●●●● In fact, the city's plan ●●●●●● not on a novel use of ●●●●●●t ●●●●●● but on one ●●●●●●ed by the ●●●●●●●●●●●● S●●●●●● Court of 1935. And ●●●●●●gh there is a long ●●●●●●y of ●●●●●●ive use of ●●●●●●t ●●●●●●, R●●●●●●d's plan has no place in it. R●●●●●●d's plan is to seize 624 ●●●●●●ges ●●●●●● at more than the homes for which they were ●●●●●●n. R●●●●●● on a ●●●●●●e ●●●●●●●●●●●●, the city would ●●●●●●sate the ●●●●●●or ●●●●●●g a ●●●●●●ge at a price ●●●●●●ting the home's ●●●●●●t value ●●●●●● than an ●●●●●●ed ●●●●●● value. The city would then sell a more ●●●●●● loan to the ●●●●●●ner. R●●●●●●d hopes this will ●●●●●● ●●●●●●nts to ●●●●●● in their homes and pay their ●●●●●●ges and ●●●●●●ty taxes. P●●●●●●nts of the plan also point out that this ●●●●●●ly will lower the risk of ●●●●●●t, ●●●●●●ting ●●●●●●ors ●●●●●●g the ●●●●●●ges. |