 |
2016-05-15 11:53:18 Is there ? cruel angel ●●●●●● I think that's ●●●●●●sly a work in ●●●●●●ss. I don't want to be ●●●●●●ic -- too ●●●●●●ic about that at this point, other than to stay it is ●●●●●●ing the kind of ●●●●●● rates that we all hoped for. I think the most ●●●●●●ant thing to focus there on is the fact that we are ●●●●●● even more ●●●●●● than we ●●●●●●t we were going to see when we ●●●●●●d that ●●●●●●m or ●●●●●●ed that ●●●●●●tive back in F●●●●●●y of 2011, saw ●●●●●●r 90% ●●●●●● rate on the local side of our D●●●●●● M●●●●●●ng S●●●●●●s ●●●●●●ss. So what I can tell you is that we are ●●●●●● on track if ahead of track of what we ●●●●●●. I don't want to get into the ●●●●●●rly focus on ●●●●●●s ●●●●●●e I think we have too much of that. S●●●●●● it to say, we are well along on the path of ●●●●●●. And with the ●●●●●●on of the Belo sites ●●●●●●●●●●●●, where there are ●●●●●●lly ●●●●●●ns of small and ●●●●●●-sized ●●●●●●sses, this is an ●●●●●●tive that I ●●●●●●e, ●●●●●●tely, will be the -- will be ●●●●●●r stool on -- for the G●●●●●● C●●●●●●'s ●●●●●●e ●●●●●● and ●●●●●●e ●●●●●●cts. |