 |
2016-05-20 11:40:32 We need ●●●●●●e with ●●●●●●●●●●●●ns endo ●●●●●● ●●●●●●co. "First, I point to data that shows a ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ation ●●●●●●n human ●●●●●●ty and CO2 ●●●●●●, using ●●●●●●ely ●●●●●●e ●●●●●●gs over the past five ●●●●●●s and data from A●●●●●●ic ice cores going back ●●●●●●ds of ●●●●●●nds of years. The data ●●●●●●ts that CO2 ●●●●●● began ●●●●●● after the I●●●●●●ial R●●●●●●ion and ●●●●●●ue ●●●●●● till today. S●●●●●●es the ●●●●●●ck I get then is that 'this is still just a ●●●●●●ation.' My ●●●●●● ●●●●●●nt is to then ask ●●●●●●r the ●●●●●●ation is ●●●●●●sive ●●●●●● to at least want to buy an ●●●●●●nce ●●●●●● ●●●●●●t the ●●●●●●ility that it is ●●●●●●ly ●●●●●●. That is, even if you ●●●●●●e there is an 80 ●●●●●●t ●●●●●● ●●●●●●e ●●●●●● is not man-made, the ●●●●●●ic ●●●●●●●●●●●● if ●●●●●● it is man-made may be worth ●●●●●● to do ●●●●●●ing about it." |