 |
2016-05-20 14:00:09 W●●●●●●ull great site ●●●●●● your dr ●●●●●● ●●●●●● your dr ●●●●●● What's most ●●●●●●sting about it, ●●●●●●, is the ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ial it holds for human ●●●●●●l ●●●●●●ment ●●●●●●lly. The vast bulk of A●●●●●●ns will not ●●●●●● ●●●●●●e ●●●●●●s – but the ●●●●●●ty will still need ●●●●●●icant, and ●●●●●●, post-●●●●●●ary ●●●●●●ion or ●●●●●●ng. There's no ●●●●●● that such non-●●●●●●●●●●●●e ●●●●●●ments ●●●●●● be ●●●●●●ed the same way: R●●●●●● the ●●●●●●ment first, pay for it later, base the ●●●●●●t on how ●●●●●●●●●●●● the ●●●●●●ment ●●●●●●es the ●●●●●●d ●●●●●● – a ●●●●●● ●●●●●● – kinda like, hmm, ●●●●●●ing. I●●●●●●uals could (as F●●●●●●n ●●●●●●w) ●●●●●●e their self-●●●●●●ement ●●●●●●h a share-of-●●●●●●-●●●●●●s ●●●●●●ing model. At this point, it ●●●●●● be clear that we're ●●●●●●g about ●●●●●● ●●●●●● ●●●●●● ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ing – ●●●●●●ts and ●●●●●●s could enter into such a ●●●●●●tage-of-●●●●●●gs ●●●●●●ement with ●●●●●●e ●●●●●●s, too. |