 |
2015-12-20 13:56:05 Your ●●●●●●t's ●●●●●●awn ●●●●●●ard ●●●●●● cost “C●●●●●● the ●●●●●●s” as such ●●●●●●nly is not the ●●●●●● – but ●●●●●●s ●●●●●●g all of the first-world ●●●●●●ies (i.e. the NATO ●●●●●● the ●●●●●●y Asian ●●●●●●s such as Japan and S. Korea) into a ●●●●●● free trade zone, and ●●●●●●lling ●●●●●●s into that zone is part of the ●●●●●●. This may allow us to ●●●●●●e some of the more ●●●●●●ious ●●●●●●s of no-holds-●●●●●● ●●●●●●●●●●●●n ●●●●●●t ●●●●●●ng the baby out with the ●●●●●●ter. It would ●●●●●●er an ●●●●●●●●●●●●lized labor ●●●●●● that is more “fair” (i.e. where skill, ●●●●●●ency and ●●●●●●y of work, ●●●●●● than a low cost of ●●●●●●, are one’s ●●●●●●y ●●●●●●itive ●●●●●●), and ●●●●●●te the ●●●●●●e of fuel in ●●●●●●ously ●●●●●●ng items ●●●●●● the globe that could just as ●●●●●● be ●●●●●●ed or ●●●●●●●●●●●● next-door to where they are sold. |