 |
2015-11-01 08:05:01 Can I call you back? an essay ●●●●●●g ●●●●●● All of the ●●●●●●●●●●●● who saw the first ●●●●●●ning in ●●●●●● 2015 or 2016 ●●●●●● that the ●●●●●●riate level of the ●●●●●●l funds rate at the end of 2016 would still be below their ●●●●●●dual ●●●●●●ment of its ●●●●●●ed ●●●●●●-run value. In ●●●●●●st, the three ●●●●●●●●●●●● who saw the first ●●●●●●ning in 2014 ●●●●●●ed that the ●●●●●●riate level of the ●●●●●●l funds rate at the end of 2016 would be at their ●●●●●●ment of its ●●●●●●-run level, which they ●●●●●● as ●●●●●● at or just above 4 ●●●●●●t. Among all ●●●●●●●●●●●●, ●●●●●●tes of the ●●●●●●-run ●●●●●● ●●●●●●l funds rate ●●●●●● from 3-14 to about 4-14 ●●●●●●t, ●●●●●●ting the C●●●●●●ee's ●●●●●●ion ●●●●●●ive of 2 ●●●●●●t and ●●●●●●●●●●●●' ●●●●●●dual ●●●●●●nts about the ●●●●●●riate ●●●●●●-run level of the real ●●●●●●l funds rate in the ●●●●●●e of ●●●●●●r ●●●●●● to the ●●●●●●y. |