 |
2015-12-22 14:41:45 I've only just ●●●●●●d ●●●●●● ●●●●●●e foam in ●●●●●● I am glad that HP ●●●●●●s its 2014 and 2015 ●●●●●●tions. It ●●●●●● to earn in ●●●●●●ive of $3.6share from this point on ( 2014 and ●●●●●●); yet, the stock is ●●●●●●g ●●●●●● $22share ●●●●●● to those joker â●●●●●●tsâ ●●●●●●t and their âprice ●●●●●●â. These ●●●●●●ts from âMizuho, E●●●●●●e, G●●●●●● Sachs, UBS, N●●●●●●, Piper J●●●●●●, R●●●●●● James, Wells Fargo, â¦â set their ●●●●●● at $22 or below is just do not make any sense. For a ●●●●●●y with ●●●●●●e over $110Byear, and ●●●●●●g $3.6share and ●●●●●● for the next 3 years, that is about 5.5x PE (price to ●●●●●●g ratio), there is no other ●●●●●●ment in S&P 500 ●●●●●● than HP. Are these ●●●●●●ts ●●●●●●●●●●●●d their ●●●●●●ts, or bias? If so, why are we ●●●●●●ing to them and why are you ●●●●●●g these ●●●●●●tions? Please stop ●●●●●●g them or to ●●●●●● out false ●●●●●●ation ( from these ●●●●●●ts) ●●●●●●e these ●●●●●●ation you are ●●●●●●ing out do not make sense. To me a price ●●●●●● in the ●●●●●●●●●●●● of $35 ( PE=10) is ●●●●●●able, do you agree? |