 |
2015-12-26 03:03:19 Could I ask who's ●●●●●●g? :.musee-●●●●●●efer-●●●●●●nebuy-●●●●●●n-t.pptx ruin ●●●●●●mycin ●●●●●●n c 300 mg ●●●●●● ●●●●●● ●●●●●● "This is ●●●●●●ly the only place in the world where we ●●●●●●ways a risk of ●●●●●●●●●●●●n," Hagel said after ●●●●●●g ●●●●●●e-story ●●●●●●ng with a ●●●●●●ated metal roof where ●●●●●●re held with North K●●●●●● on C●●●●●●nce Row in the ●●●●●●●●●●●● of P●●●●●●om. :.●●●●●●●●●●●●c-●●●●●●eride-●●●●●●.pptx ●●●●●●●●●●●●lity ●●●●●●ia price ●●●●●●se ●●●●●●dings sing It wasn’t the R●●●●●●cans ●●●●●●ons on gay ●●●●●●ge and ●●●●●●on that made them lose in 2012. It was the fact that many ●●●●●●, ●●●●●●ally A●●●●●● A●●●●●●ns, still had a good ●●●●●●n of him. If he would have been white I think Obama would have lost in 2012. If you take away the extra ●●●●●●t from ●●●●●● and add in extra ●●●●●●t from C●●●●●●ans and R●●●●●●can types that did not vote in 2012 (●●●●●●e they didn’t like Romney) I think the R●●●●●●cans would have won. But I think 2016 will be a ●●●●●● big win for the ●●●●●●icans – maybe 350 ●●●●●●ral votes or more. I know most ●●●●●● will not think it’s ●●●●●●le but that is how it works. Two terms for Reagan, two for C●●●●●●, two for Bush, two for Obama. Almost every time it ●●●●●●es to the ●●●●●●te party after two terms. This time will be no ●●●●●●ent but more ●●●●●●nced – Reagan-like. |