 |
2016-01-03 14:08:42 When do you want me to start? ●●●●●●ex plus In ●●●●●●st, it's ●●●●●●e near as easy to see how we can take any ●●●●●● in Syria that doesn't make ●●●●●● worse: The ●●●●●●●●●●●●on's ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ive of ●●●●●●ing no ●●●●●●gic ●●●●●● ●●●●●● Syria but ●●●●●● "●●●●●●ing" Assad for using ●●●●●●al ●●●●●●s, ●●●●●● back, ●●●●●●d and ●●●●●●aphed ●●●●●●●●●●●● in ●●●●●●e to ●●●●●● no real ●●●●●●e (and to ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ic ●●●●●●tion), ●●●●●● one ●●●●●●ing what ●●●●●●s Assad – let alone any other ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ctor – is ●●●●●●ly ●●●●●●ed to learn. On the other hand, more ●●●●●●ive ●●●●●●s carry not just the risk but the near-●●●●●●nty of ●●●●●●r ●●●●●●an ●●●●●●ing, ●●●●●●rment of ●●●●●● at least as ●●●●●●al to the US as Assad, ●●●●●●s ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ry ●●●●●●●●●●●● in and ●●●●●●●●●●●●ty for the ●●●●●●y, and, ●●●●●●tely, ●●●●●●r anti-U.S. "●●●●●●ck." |