 |
2016-01-05 07:15:19 I'd like to ●●●●●● this ●●●●●●ng order ●●●●●●uel ●●●●●● Wow, R●●●●●●cans lying to the A●●●●●●n ●●●●●● to ●●●●●●t ●●●●●●ate ●●●●●●s and to try to make Obama’s ●●●●●●ure ●●●●●●ation fail. There are only 2 ●●●●●●ences ●●●●●●n what these R●●●●●●can ●●●●●●als are doing (and it’s the ●●●●●●ors’ ●●●●●●●●●●●●ty) and what R●●●●●●cans ●●●●●●hed C●●●●●● over: 1.) Unlike these ●●●●●●’ ●●●●●●ors, C●●●●●● was ●●●●●● to ●●●●●● ●●●●●●ons under oath, and 2.) What C●●●●●● lied about was a ●●●●●●al ●●●●●● and didn’t ●●●●●● the ●●●●●● in any way. What these R●●●●●●can ●●●●●●ors are lying about ●●●●●●ly ●●●●●●s the A●●●●●●n ●●●●●●, and could ●●●●●●ly have an ●●●●●●e ●●●●●● on the lives, ●●●●●● and ●●●●●●ial ●●●●●●ty of ●●●●●●ially ●●●●●●ns of A●●●●●●ns. And yet C●●●●●● was ●●●●●●hed while these ●●●●●●ors carry no ●●●●●●●●●●●●ty for their ●●●●●●ous ●●●●●●s. They are in a ●●●●●●on to do more ●●●●●● to this ●●●●●●y than al Qaeda, and they’re ●●●●●● full ●●●●●●age of that ●●●●●●on. They are anti-A●●●●●●ns. |